7,739
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
==Organisational connections== | ==Organisational connections== | ||
===Counting women members=== | |||
This query returns organisations which had women as members, and the number of women in our dataset who were members of those organisations. As such it is a relatively straightforward query. The power of running this query across linked data, however, is in following the links to an organisation of interest (perhaps because they are ranked surprisingly high or low in our data) and then seeing who were members of that organisation by hitting the 'What Links Here' link on the organisation item page. | This query returns organisations which had women as members, and the number of women in our dataset who were members of those organisations. As such it is a relatively straightforward query. The power of running this query across linked data, however, is in following the links to an organisation of interest (perhaps because they are ranked surprisingly high or low in our data) and then seeing who were members of that organisation by hitting the 'What Links Here' link on the organisation item page. | ||
Line 71: | Line 73: | ||
==Nodes in networks== | ==Nodes in networks== | ||
===Who was working to advance women in the field=== | |||
Faced with lots of data it can be hard to see the people that mattered, the apparent pockets of influence, the nodes in the network. This simple query makes a start at that, returning people who signed nominations for women to be elected as Fellows of the Society of Antiquaries of London based on their personal knowledge of the individual, their good standing, their expertise, etc. And whilst the results of the query need interpreting against other evidence, it provides points of entry, ways of thinking about who was doing the labour of getting women's work recognised at a national level. | Faced with lots of data it can be hard to see the people that mattered, the apparent pockets of influence, the nodes in the network. This simple query makes a start at that, returning people who signed nominations for women to be elected as Fellows of the Society of Antiquaries of London based on their personal knowledge of the individual, their good standing, their expertise, etc. And whilst the results of the query need interpreting against other evidence, it provides points of entry, ways of thinking about who was doing the labour of getting women's work recognised at a national level. | ||
<sparql tryit="1"> | <sparql tryit="1"> |